|
|
Under Construction, writing and categorizing like crazy!
<<<Back to Main Review Page
|
Everything you ever thought you knew
about a ribbon mic just gets tossed out the window (or wind-er as they say in
the mountains) when you hear the A440. Its like holding a small tank in your hands,
heavy and all metal and built to last. If you dropped it on somebodys head,
they likely would not survive and if they did they probably wouldnt be quite
right afterwards. It really is amazingly heavy. Its the detail and output that
makes you scratch your head and wonder how they did it.
The amplifier on board the phantom
powered A440 is scorching high output, except noise. It really is among the
quietest mics on the planet, yet the output just screams hot detailed sound.
The first time I ever put one up, I had it in the next room and the doors were
open down the hall from the control room to the live room, maybe separated by
30 feet (were talking no direct line between me and that mic, and 5 turns in
between). I pulled the monitors up and could sit there and very lightly slap my
hands together and it was like there was no wall / window between me and the
mic. With some condenser mics that is not an amazing feat, but remember this is
a ribbon mic and the preamp wasnt even cranked up yet. THAT is a stellar
performance, Ive never seen a ribbon capable of this kind of response.
HUGE, smooth, midrange focused and
that gentle / smoky / dancing sort of top end you only get from Wes Dooley on
his large ribbon mics. The realism is amazing, definitely the kind of mic youd
want on a scoring stage where every inch of the room should be captured. I
never got to use one in a live situation (I dont get out much) but this was
the central theme to the design.
Conclusion: Overkill for a project
or home studio maybe, when you dont need to distant mic a concert (buy an R84
or R44 for typical close mic studio use). The A440 has its place in high end
scoring stages and studios that can afford the best
|
|
If a ribbon mic can deliver as much vibe
in looks as it can in sound, well then thatd be one vibe-y microphone for
sure. The R44 is the vibe monster for sure with its classic looks and tone for
days. The R44C is a reproduction of the famous RCA 44 B and BX models. In
fact, parts are interchangeable between the two. Wes Dooley also bought up
original stock aluminum from RCA to continue repairing 44 mics, and now he uses
that same element material in his R44.
The bottom end response of the R44
from just about any distance is stunning. It has a life to it that is almost
scary, it really loves to deliver bass energy. The midrange on the mic is very
present and forward, and top end rolls off gently and while some might call it
dark, the R44 still has a unique sort of electric sound to the top end that I
dig. Its a very sweet sound, but a thick sweet sound if thats what youre
looking for. On acoustic sources and voice it delivers a big sound that takes
up a lot of space between the speakers with its size.
Conclusion: It delivers the classic
huge ribbon sound, is never bright yet still has a nice detail to it. A lot of
vibe can be had with this one microphone. The CNE version is the same mic only
the details of appearance arent as ornate.
|
|
My favorite ribbon mic, and the first
ribbon to ever make me reach into my own funds and say I need that sound all
the time!. The R84 is so much ribbon mic for $1,000 its ridiculous. It has a
classic yet somehow more modern look to it at the same time. Its very
lightweight and easy to position with the yoke style mount. It offers a
different response from the rear vs the front of the mic, and it comes hard
wired with a quad mic cable that is uber quiet. Whats not to love?
The real beauty of course is in the
sound. When I use the word forgiving a lot of the time I mean a clean
delivery of the midrange. The R84 is forgiving in this sense. A lot of the low
mid and midrange on some sources can cause a muddy sort of sound to happen. The
R84 tends to still give you the size with its proximity effect in close micing
(the 84 is very big sounding from about 14 or less on most sources) but not
the mud. The upper mids gently roll back forward to a top end that has a sheen
to it unlike any other ribbon on the market. For a ribbon mic, the R84 can
deliver an air-y space without being bright. Its this natural and forgiving
mic with that sheen / vibe up top that nothing else in this range delivers.
Conclusion: If you buy one ribbon
mic and can afford it, grab an R84 first for all things acoustic, drum and
voice. Its the best of classic meets modern sound around, in an affordable
price range.
|
|
With a sound that lands squarely
between the big smooth R84 and the more present R92, the R88 gives you instant
Blumlein and MS stereo recording from a single point with no fuss and no muss
(what is muss anyhow?). Weighing in at only 3 pounds (minus the cabling) its
extremely easy to tote around and setup on any standard boom. It can handle
165dB SPL also, so a great choice for crazy loud source recording.
For drums, concert halls, close
micd acoustic instruments, vocals and more, the R88 is very versatile. It has
a full but natural sound and leans more towards the smooth and clean side of
character. Being that its only down -3dB at 15kHz also, it delivers the room
and details nicely as well. Just because its stereo doesnt mean you cant use
one side of it for mono vocal tracking as well.
Conclusion: In the studio or on the
road its a great choice for easy stereo use. Wes Dooley has another winner on
his hands, its very versatile and realistic.
|
|
Welcome to close micd guitar cab
heaven, among other places. Addressing the concern of woofy low end proximity
effect when using ribbon mics up close, Wes & Company took the R92 to a new
level of usefulness. By tensioning the ribbon element to accent higher in the
frequency range, a new ribbon was born that you could shove right into a
chunkin guitar rig and get all the goodness from one mic. The mic has to weigh
less than one pound, and the swivel yoke mount is pure genius and one of the
best Ive seen on any mic in any price range as far as easy positioning goes.
Subdued bottom end response, a
detailed midrange and very present upper midrange deliver those close micd
cabs with authority, requiring little to no EQ during mix time. Great crunch
and presence, sort of like what your favorite moving coil design might deliver,
but with the smooth mids of a ribbon mic. On acoustic sources, the R92 shines
again without giving you too much boom but better cut for a ribbon. It still
isnt a bright mic, but room detail and air isnt ignored either.
Conclusion: Especially for guitar
cab micing, the R92 is recommended. It is a unique mic tuned up for this
specific purpose, and does it well.
|
|
Ive always found the APEX 205 to be
the perfect ribbon microphone for those that dont have any more money but want
to experience a ribbon mic for themselves. It does not excel beyond major brand
designs in quality nor in sound, however it excels in its price range. The 205
is the smaller brother of the APEX 210 ribbon, it is more lightweight and
easier to handle, and also does not have a hard wired cable like the 210. The
blue paint job is definitely different looking from most mics, in that the
paint used almost looks
like
what you might use on an engine block!
The 205 is, for lack of a better
word, a little smaller sounding than the 210 as well. It has a deep low end
response, smooth midrange, and is not as dark as youd expect up top. It
certainly is accented in the extreme low end, so close micing of guitar cabs
may get woofy and if so, youll need to back it off to maybe 10 or 12 to find
balance.
Conclusion: At this price there is
no complaining. If you cannot afford a ShinyBox (heavily modified version of
this mic with Lundahl and Cinemag options) the 205 is certainly a strong entry
level performer.
|
|
The 210 is the big brother of the
APEX 205, much larger and heavier and also has an attached XLR cable. In the
under $150 ribbon pricing range as an un-modded mic, the 210 happens to be my
favorite right out of the box.
There is a bigger sound to be had vs
the 205, but I also like the top end response better with the 210 on things
like drums. For an inexpensive room mic I would suggest the 210, it can do OK on
acoustic sources too and tends to round off transients a bit if youre looking
for that smoothed out sort of sound. The low end can be woofy, again not a real
strong performer on close micd guitar cabs but back it off a bit and its
beyond useable. In a recent live ribbon shootout, the 210 bested quite a few
expensive ribbons on drum room.
Conclusion: Another strong entry
level performer I can attest to, the 210 is a lot of mic for short cash. If the
budget is tight and you dont want to have the mic modded, grab a 210.
|
|
A great partner for the M160 for MS recording
with its symmetrical response front and back (figure 8 of course) the M130 is
an old staple that does a decent job at sounding natural if not a little dark
overall. Small in size, its also a convenient mic to deal with. It utilizes a
small ribbon and compared to many of the new large (2) ribbons on the market,
it tends to have a smaller sound overall but transient response with things
like drums and guitars is snappier. The double ribbon design increases output
level to a degree.
The low end response is decent but
not big, midrange is smooth with a decent detail to it for sure. The top end
certainly rolls off to an extent, still I would not call this a dark ribbon
mic. You can utilize the off axis rejection at the sides (figure 8 mics have a
virtual 100% null by nature when perfectly off axis) by making placement your
new BFF. Even with the double element though, the Beyer ribbons are gain hungry
for the most part so bring a real preamp with low noise.
Conclusion: A mainstay for a reason,
it couples well with the M160 but also does a decent job of its own in the
studio and on location.
|
|
One of the only directional ribbon
mics on the market (OK all ribbons are figure 8 by nature, but by use of
baffling etc Beyer has controlled the pattern across most of the frequency
range) the M160 is a friend in tight spaces and small rooms that you still want
a classic ribbon sound with. A bit of a dark ribbon, it still takes EQ well
like most ribbons and can be brought to life on top. For drum overhead in a
small room, the M160 is tight and smooths out transients a bit. The double
ribbon element design helps some with output levels. The small ribbon design
doesnt have the boom of modern day large ribbons, that isnt necessarily a bad
or good thing of course.
The low end is round but not huge,
plenty to work with though if your source isnt too far away. The smooth
midrange is slightly veiled but pleasant, and the top end has a slight point in
the upper mids before gently rolling off the more extreme high end. On guitar
cabs the M160 is enjoyed by many but I must admit: Ive tried it more than once
and didnt like it on high SPL cabinets as it did not handle the volume very
well. For lower volume guitar cab work though, the smooth midrange is
desirable.
Conclusion: Need a directional
ribbon? There arent many choices out there at all, but luckily the M160 is an
old stand by that you kind of cant go wrong with in most standard
applications.
|
|
Talk about a specific sound! OK
forget all that talk about dark ribbons you hear, the M260 is brighter than
most small diaphragm condenser mics (yes I am serious). This mic has cut for
days, however being that it is a ribbon mic its not as annoying and tends to
stay fairly smooth. Still, high end is what this mic is all about.
Hypercardioid with a super tight pattern, there is a built in filter set at
200hZ that eliminates any real low end response. Already rolling your guitar
tracks off at 200 or higher in the mix, and want some cut? The M260 could be
the mic for you. On acoustic guitar it will give you all of the strum and pick
noise, and almost none of the body! Those are not negative comments, just stating
a fact that this is one thin and bright sounding mic (for a ribbon especially).
Conclusion: There are times when
thats what you want and need, lots of cut without the body. The M260 delivers
it in droves!
|
|
You expect ribbon mics to be several
things; keep away from phantom power, low output, dark sounding and having a
large proximity effect (bass buildup) to deal with. Well along comes Skipper and
Martins of BLUE and toss the Woodpecker into the ribbon arena and well, its
beyond shaking things upits a unique offering to say the least. The
Woodpecker ships in a wooden box, and comes with a gold shock mount that really
sets off the mic with its walnut stained wooden body and gold headbasket and
screen. It is phantom powered, the onboard amplifier requires it to boost
output levels.
The Woodpecker is the perfect
marriage between condenser mic and ribbon mic. The output of this mic is
tremendous, some even think its too much (I dont) but think about the fact
that you dont have to turn up your mic preamp much, and its all sort of a
wash as far as self noise (there is some self noise to the phantom powered
preamp on board). The sensitivity and detail is very condenser like, and most
noticeable in the upper mids and top end response which is not normally
accented in a ribbon mic. The Woodpecker isnt bright, it still has the ribbon
smoothness top to bottom that gently rounds transients, but it will actually
deliver the sparkle of an acoustic instrument and the breath and air of a
vocal. Cymbals and drums cut through without having to use extreme EQ, its a great
drum overhead or room mic. It has a gentle roll off at the extreme top end, a
very natural sort of sound that gets a little darker the closer to 20k it gets.
The other thing is, proximity effect is not so much an issue and you can mic
vocals and instruments close with the Woodpecker and not suffer so much boom
and flub. This also means the Woodpecker does have a smaller size to the
sound, which is a reason many folks want ribbons. For this reason I say the
Woodpecker is a specific reach since it does not sound traditional.
Conclusion: If you love condensers
but hate the overly emphasized tizzy sound and sharp transient response, the
Woodpecker is the absolute reach for you. If you love ribbons but wish they had
a more detailed and present sound without the low end size, again the
Woodpecker is made for you. One of the more unique sounds available for sure.
|
|
Utilizing a dual ribbon element to
increase output and sensitivity, the Trion 7000 does put out somewhat hotter
than other ribbons Ive used but dont expect double! Its a very cool looking
mic for sure, with that spherical headbasket its a very attractive way to
finish it off. Again, the Trion series finish almost has this rubber coated
feel to the finish that is unique. A spider style shock mount and case are
included.
The Trion 7000 is one of those smooths
everything out sounding ribbons, a very round sound is had with it. I really
like it on voice in particular for a dark smooth response, but it is
interesting to twist it off axis a bit and further change the sound of the mic
which I liked slightly off axis on more than one voice. On guitar cabs, its
not a mic that delivers bite much so bright cabs benefit nicely from the
7000. Drums and things will require a fair amount of high EQ boost, but like
most ribbons the Trion 7000 takes EQ pretty darn well. The dual element at
times can have a slight phase-y sound to it in the upper frequencies, due to
slightly different arrival times from off axis sounds.
Proximity
effect is pretty big with the 7000, you would not stick it right on a guitar
cab as it would need a little space to prevent woofy, so working the distance
is key.
Conclusion: A dark ribbon with the
smoothed over transient sound, perfect for taking the edge off of bright
sources (have not tried on horns but I would definitely try it there). On voice
it had a sound I really liked, and I did think it could get a little more
interesting off axis a bit.
|
|
This figure 8 ribbon is, well, a few
things: heavy and built to survive a bomb blast (beefy brass housing), true
vintage (its been around for decades and is the same BBC design) and a
recognizable sound particularly on voice / spoken word (hence the BBC design?).
Its known for being the sole overhead mic for Ringo Starr on many Beatles
records as well as countless other recordings.
On drums it has a nice way of
delivering punch in the low end and low mids. As a room or overhead mic, it
brings life to the lower registers. There is a small bump up in the upper
midrange and then it quickly rolls off to a pretty dark top. Like most ribbons
it takes EQ pretty well though if you need to EQ some top back in. I found it
to be a little crunchy in the sibilance area on my voice. On guitar cabs it is
best not to bring it in too closely or to use on very loud cabs, high SPL can
distort the mic in this position so back it off a bit.
Conclusion: The 4038 is a pretty
specific reach for drum overhead and room mic use, and like any good mic can
work wonders when positioned right and matched to the source. It certainly is
one of the more interesting looking mics ever as well.
|
|
The newest and updated design from
Coles Electroacoustics, the gold plated canister look is very unique. The
figure 8 pattern ribbon has a sturdy feel and comes from the same lineage as
the 4038 but with a more extended response and more present top end. The output
also seems a bit hotter compared to the 4038. For things like guitar cabs,
horns and strings, drums and voice the 4040 brings a modern presence to ribbon
mics that is welcomed. Youll find yourself doing less top end boost on many
sources. Essentially I find the 4040 to be 4038-esque but with a flatter
extended response that suits more sources.
Conclusion: An all purpose offering
from Coles that gives you more output and top end response compared to its
brother the 4038.
|
|
At the time of this writing I have
only experimented a bit with the R44. I will say that in this price range I am
hearing a more balanced sound than other $100 ribbon mics I have tried. For
some reason I dig the fact that it just kind of looks like a side address large
condenser micits like a sneak attack trojan ribbon mic!
Just to get it out of the way, no
the R44 does not sound anything close to an RCA 44 or any of the other 44 type
ribbons Ive heard. That doesnt mean its not a surprising little mic for the
dough, just dont let the marketing influence your decision to buy or not to
buy. What Im hearing out of the mic is a more controlled low end response vs
typical $100 ribbons, and a midrange that is more evenly represented and linear
and response too. The top end is actually pretty well represented, yeah its
dark-ish but the 1.8 micron element seems to be delivering more detail than Im
used to in entry level.
Conclusion: My initial impression of
the R44 is that it doesnt knock mics out of the high end range off of any
pedestal, but it seems to have the potential to deliver a more all purpose
sound than its same priced counterparts. In other words, it doesnt sound high
end but for the money Im inclined to say give the R44 a spin first if all you
got is $100.
|
|
I have only begun to test the R77,
but so far so good. The R77 exhibits an extended top end and low end that is
noticeably higher fidelity than many ribbons. The appearance is, I gotta say,
slightly gaudy in person. I only say that because the clash of the silver and
gold is maybe a little much but its not ugly! Just different looking, it
actually has the old
Radio
City look to it too. The R77 has a 1.8 micron ribbon element. The yoke
mount is very solid, it ships with a Mogami cable (a thinner gauge 2 conductor,
not Gold Series quad) and a cleaning cloth which, now that I think of it, is
pretty much needed to keep all that chrome and gold shining.
The extended sound of the R77 is
pretty detailed overall. It has a natural sort of sound for the most part, the
low end has more of a deep and round thing happening and not the woof
associated with many ribbons. The midrange is linear sounding for the most
part, but there is a bit of a point to the upper midrange. That point can help
a source like guitar and some instruments cut through the mix, or of course it
could need to be EQd out (some vocals for example may need a little de-essing
in that range). Either way, it has a specific bump in the upper mids. Top end
response is refreshingly open sounding for a ribbon. Self noise is noticeably
pretty low.
Conclusion: The R77 is a nice entry
to the ribbon mic market for MXL. It feels very solid, and certainly looks
vintage. Its a more extended sound, but does have a bit of a specific sound in
the upper mids compared to other ribbons.
|
|
The R14 is a big sounding ribbon for
sure. Hand assembled in the
USA, the R14 ships in a
wooden box with a shock mount. It doesnt really look like a ribbon mic at
first glance really, more like a side address condenser appearance. Like most
ribbons the R14 is a figure 8 design with equal (yet opposite polarity)
response front to back, and a very strong null off axis at the sides.
On drums I was amazed at what the
R14 delivered. It reaches down and grabs kick and floor toms in a very unique
way, and takes them right to the surface! Boom and thwack are delivered in a
big and deep way. The R14 is of the darker ribbon variety, yet it delivered a
nice attack on the snare and other drums too. It takes EQ nicely like most
ribbons, in a very smooth way. On electric guitar that huge low end response
can maybe get you in a bit of trouble, accented the range that you normally
have to hi-pass during the mix. Midrange is delivered smoothly, with decent
upper mid presence as well as a punchy low mid response. Not an airy mic (most ribbons arent) it has a bit
of a closed sound to it that is typical of classic ribbon designs. Voice is
delivered big and smooth and natural, and with not too much brightness going on
it does not tend to get essy.
Conclusion: This is a BIG sounding
mic. For distant and drum micing, the R14 is an excellent reach for sure. As a
single mic on an entire drum kit, you could likely get away with an optional
kick mic if you place the R14 correctly.
|
|
You dont always have to spend a lot
of money to have the clouds part and have a heavenly experience with gear.
Ribbon mic owners know that sometimes even the highest gain preamps could use
an assist in getting signals hot enough on quiet sources (or maybe youre sick
of topping out your preamp and bringing all that noise with it). The FetHead is
a real solution that does not get in the way of the sound of the source, it
sounds essentially true to the source.
FetHead is a super low noise phantom
powered +20dB boost for ribbon mics that really does the job without bringing
the noise. There isnt a whole lot to say other than it adds loads of gain and,
as long as your phantom power supply is quiet, does not bring any real
noticeable noise on its own. Using FetHead to record a source with my gain pot
around
12:30, then using without but my gain pot maxed, I do not hear a difference
in noise! This thing is really quiet. I have also concluded that FetHead does
not take away from the sound and tone of ribbon mics but rather it opens them
up ever so slightly. Im talking just a couple percent difference but even this
small difference is welcome as clarity can be enhanced. It is useful with
dynamic mics such as the Shure SM7B and RE20 which are quite gain hungry, same
effect: super hot output with low noise and a slightly more present signal.
Conclusion: Now you can find out
what quieter sources sound like with those low output ribbons and dynamic mics.
Even if you have $1,000 ribbon mics this inexpensive device will allow them to
shine. Stop running out of steam on your preamp, FetHead is a winner.
|
|
|
|